Quick answer

As of September 24, 2026: Komodo v2.3.3 for uncapped GitOps fleets and Swarm; Portainer for Kubernetes or BE controls, with CE staying on 2.45 LTS (supported to May 2027) as 3.0 goes Kubernetes-first; Dockge 1.5.0 for existing Compose hosts, with no release since March 2025; Arcane v2.13.1 for new single-host Compose installs.

Contents

Portainer changed this comparison on September 11, 2026: version 3.0 goes Kubernetes-first, and Community Edition stays on the 2.x line, where 2.45 LTS is supported until May 2027. As of September 24, I would pick Komodo (v2.3.3) for a fleet of Docker hosts that wants Git-backed deploys or Swarm, with no server cap; Portainer for Kubernetes, Podman or Business Edition team controls, or plain CE 2.45 if it already does the job; and Dockge (1.5.0) for one or two Compose hosts only if you already run it and accept a tool with no release since March 2025. For a new single-host install that wants Dockge’s files-on-disk model, I would start with Arcane (v2.13.1).

Correction, September 8: CE supports custom OAuth and limited LDAP. The table and summaries separate authentication from BE roles, provider templates and group mapping.

The three at a glance

PortainerKomodoDockge
LicenseCE Zlib; BE commercialGPL-3.0MIT
ScopeDocker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Podman, edgeDocker, Compose stacks, Swarm (v2.0.0+), GitOpsCompose only
Multi-hostYes, Portainer Agent or Edge Agent (governance in BE)Yes, uncappedYes (v1.4+)
RBACBE role hierarchy; CE basic user managementIncludedNone (by design)
AuthenticationCE custom OAuth and limited LDAP; BE adds provider templates and group mappingLocal, OIDC and GitHub logins; passkey or TOTP 2FALocal login; no OIDC
ArchitectureServer + agentsCore + Periphery + databaseSingle Node service
Best forKubernetes, Podman, BE team controlsMulti-host fleets, SwarmOne or two Compose hosts

If you run Portainer CE today

Stay on CE 2.45 LTSPortainer BE, 3 nodes freeKomodoArcaneDockgeDockhand
Latest release2.45.1 LTS, Sep 17, 20262.45 LTS; 3.0 STS planned for October 2026v2.3.3, Sep 1, 2026v2.13.1, Sep 22, 20261.5.0, Mar 30, 2025v1.0.49, Sep 23, 2026
Releases, 90 days to Sep 247 (2.39, 2.44 and 2.45 lines)Same 2.45 LTS schedule as CE419014
Support window2.45 LTS to May 2027; 2.39 LTS to Nov 20262.45 LTS to May 2027; 3.3 LTS planned Dec 2026 to Sep 2027----
Licence and paid tiersZlib; no paid tierCommercial; free to 3 nodes, then Home & Student $155/yr (15 nodes, non-commercial), Starter from $1,045/yr, Scale from $2,095/yrGPL-3.0; one editionBSD-3-ClauseMITBSL 1.1, free for personal and internal business use; RBAC is Enterprise; Apache 2.0 from Jan 1, 2029
Free login optionsLocal users, custom OAuth, limited LDAPAdds provider templates, Active Directory and group mappingLocal, OIDC, GitHub; passkey or TOTP 2FA (v2.0.0)OIDC and passkeys (as of v2.10.0)Local login onlyLocal users and OIDC SSO
SwarmYesYes; kept in 3.x, ordered after KubernetesYes, since v2.0.0 (Mar 24, 2026)Yes: Swarm stacks from Git; an agent serves its host’s Swarm nodeNo-
Multi-hostPortainer Agent or Edge AgentSame agentsPeriphery agent per host, outbound since v2.0.0; no server limitArcane Agent per host, Direct or Edge modeA Dockge instance per host, connected from the first (1.4.0+)Hawser agent or direct TCP
Where stacks liveInside the portainer_data volume, or a Git repoSame as CEWritten to the host, files already on the host, or a Git repo cloned to itFiles in its data directory, /app/data/projects by defaultFiles on disk, /opt/stacks by default-
Extra servicesNoneNoneMongoDB or FerretDB, plus Periphery per hostNone; its database sits in its data volumeNoneNone required: SQLite, or PostgreSQL
Verdict for a CE userThe default: nothing forces a move before May 2027For 3.x on three nodes or fewer; its new work is Kubernetes-firstFor a fleet, GitOps and Swarm with no node capFor Compose files on disk, OIDC and an active release lineOnly if you already run itIf per-image CVE scans matter and BSL 1.1 fits

Read September 24, 2026 from the GitHub releases API, each project’s documentation and Portainer’s lifecycle and pricing pages; a dash means none of them states it. Arcane and Dockhand release almost weekly, so recheck the first two rows before you move.

What you actually run
Uncapped and free has a price, and it is paid in processes, not dollars. Every box below is a separate service you install and keep alive. This footprint, more than any feature list, is the real split between the three.
Dockge1 service
Dockge
One Node container. Your compose files stay on disk. Add another Dockge instance per extra host and connect it from the first (v1.4+).
Portainer1 service
Portainer Server+ agent · optional
One server container. It stores its own database internally, so nothing extra to run. An agent (standard or Edge) only for remote hosts.
Komodo3+ services, grows per host
Komodo Core+Database (MongoDB or FerretDB)+Periphery agent × each host
A Rust Core, a separate database, and one agent per managed server. That is the cost of no license meter.

Portainer: still capable, now partly paywalled

Portainer is the broadest of the three. Besides Docker and Swarm it manages Kubernetes, Podman environments and edge devices, and its Community Edition is free and open source (Zlib). The friction is what moved to Business Edition (BE):

  • RBAC is BE-only. BE has a full seven-role hierarchy (Administrator, Environment Administrator, Operator, Namespace Operator, Helpdesk, Standard User, Read-Only); CE has only basic single-tier user management.
  • Authentication: CE supports custom OAuth and limited LDAP. BE adds identity-provider templates, Active Directory integration and automatic group-to-team mapping. The paid distinction is those directory and configuration features, not every form of SSO. See Portainer’s edition comparison.
  • Audit logging, advanced GitOps, registry management, and S3 backups are BE features too.

The licensing math, from Portainer’s pricing FAQ on September 24, 2026: BE is free for your first three nodes, one licence per organization (Portainer’s three-node page). Beyond that, Starter is from $105/month ($1,045/year) and Scale from $209/month ($2,095/year). The non-commercial Home & Student plan is $155/year for up to 15 nodes.

For a homelab, three free nodes is generous. The catch is one licence per organization, and past three nodes a business pays from $1,045 a year.

Compose stacks created in Portainer’s web editor live inside Portainer’s portainer_data volume rather than as files you manage, and editing them outside the UI is awkward.

What 3.0 changes. On September 11, 2026 Portainer’s CEO announced that 2.45 LTS is the last 2.x release and that 3.x is a Kubernetes-first codebase. Inside 3.x, Docker environments stay, as do Swarm and Podman, and keep working, but they will not receive new capabilities as the Kubernetes side grows. CE does not move to 3.x. It stays on 2.x for as long as 2.45 LTS is supported, which the lifecycle page puts at May 2027, and the post promises the 2.45 LTS line, CE and BE alike, security fixes, bug fixes and back-ports of every 3.x capability that has a Docker API to match (without promising feature parity), and 3.x stays free on the three-node BE licence. The lifecycle page plans 3.0 as an STS release in October 2026 and the first 3.x LTS, 3.3, for December 2026.

If you stay on Portainer, patch first. 2.45.0 and 2.39.7 (both August 27) fixed a critical Docker proxy authorization bypass that let non-admin users reach the Docker API directly. The current patches are 2.45.1 LTS (September 17) and 2.39.8 LTS (September 16). 2.39 LTS support ends in November 2026, and the short-term line ended with 2.44, whose support ran out in August.

The line Portainer drew
Community Edition is genuinely free, but the team-oriented features moved to paid Business Edition. Komodo and Dockge draw no such line.
Portainer
Free · Community Edition
Container & stack management Compose & K8s / Swarm Basic single-tier users One "Custom" OAuth option
Paid · Business Edition
RBAC · 7-role hierarchy Provider templates + group mapping Audit logging · S3 backups Advanced GitOps · registries
Free up to 3 nodes, then from $105–$209/mo
Komodo
No edition split. RBAC, uncapped multi-host, GitOps — all in the free GPL-3.0 build.
Dockge
No line to draw. It omits RBAC and SSO by design, not by paywall — everything it does is free.

Komodo: open-source, uncapped, more to run

Komodo is GPL-3.0, written mostly in Rust, and its README is blunt about the two limits Portainer sells: “There is no limit to the number of servers you can connect, and there will never be. There is no limit to what API you can use for automation, and there never will be.” I found one edition and no paid tier.

Architecturally it’s a Core + Periphery model. Komodo Core is the central service and talks to a database: MongoDB, or FerretDB on Postgres for systems that cannot run current MongoDB versions. A Periphery agent runs on every managed host and reports container status and logs plus system usage back to Core. Since v2.0.0 (March 24, 2026) Periphery can open the connection to Core itself, and the two authenticate with auto-generated key pairs. You deploy it with Docker Compose.

Komodo v2.0.0 also added Docker Swarm management, down to services and secrets. Swarm no longer needs Portainer. The same release added passkey or TOTP two-factor login and let one account link several login providers (local, OIDC, GitHub).

The payoff is fleet management, all free. A stack’s compose file can be written in the UI, point at files already on the host, or come from a Git repo that Komodo clones to the host. The cost is operational: a Rust service plus a database plus an agent per server, more moving parts than a single container. Komodo shipped v2.3.3 on September 1, 2026, its fourth release in the 90 days to September 24.

Komodo’s own variables and secrets live in its database and go into a stack’s environment with double brackets ([[KEY]]). That environment is written to a .env file and passed to Compose with --env-file, so ordinary ${VAR} references in your compose files still resolve.

Dockge: the lightweight Compose manager

Dockge comes from Louis Lam, the creator of Uptime Kuma, who built it after being frustrated with Portainer’s stack management (spinning loaders, unclear errors). It’s MIT-licensed and deliberately narrow: it manages Docker Compose and nothing fancier.

The defining feature is that it keeps your compose.yaml editable on disk — it “won’t kidnap your compose files,” so they stay usable with normal docker compose commands outside the UI. You get a reactive web editor, an interactive terminal, a docker run → Compose converter, and multi-agent support since v1.4. The Dockge setup guide covers the install and the stacks-path mistake.

What it deliberately lacks: RBAC, OIDC, vulnerability scanning, and a REST API. That’s the point.

The caveat in 2026 is maintenance. Dockge has not cut a tagged release since 1.5.0 on March 30, 2025. Commits kept landing on the default branch until April 2026, the last on April 19 titled “fixed missed v-html xss warning vulnerability”, and none of that work has shipped as a release. On September 21, 2026 a user opened issue #1002, “Status of this project?”, citing security issues with no response; it had no reply when I checked on September 24.

It still works, and it is simple. MIT means nobody can pull it out from under you. If you already run it on one or two hosts, nothing here forces a move. New installs should start on Arcane. It keeps Compose projects as files on disk and still ships releases.

Portainer vs Dockge vs Komodo: head-to-head

Portainer vs Dockge

Portainer is a full platform (Docker, Swarm, Kubernetes, Podman, edge) with a heavier UI; Dockge is a focused Compose-only manager with a lighter one. The deciding factor is usually file ownership: Portainer’s editor tends to tie a stack to Portainer, while Dockge leaves your compose.yaml on disk and editable with plain docker compose.

If you run one or two hosts and live in Compose, Dockge wins on simplicity, provided you accept no release since March 2025; if you need Kubernetes or Business Edition team features, Portainer wins on breadth.

Portainer vs Komodo

Both manage multiple hosts. Since Komodo v2.0.0, both manage Swarm. Portainer CE includes custom OAuth and limited LDAP; BE adds granular RBAC, provider templates, group mapping and audit logging, with the three-node free license described above. Komodo is GPL-3.0 with no business edition, server cap or API cap. The 3.0 announcement tips it further for Docker users: CE stays on 2.45 LTS until May 2027 with fixes and back-ports of the 3.x features that have a Docker API, while Docker and Swarm environments inside 3.x get no new capabilities. I would choose Komodo for a Docker fleet with GitOps, accepting its database and per-host agents. Choose Portainer for Kubernetes, Podman or BE team controls; a custom OAuth login alone does not require BE.

Komodo vs Dockge

Both are fully free. Their scope is very different. Dockge is a single Node service for Compose on one or two hosts; Komodo is a Rust Core plus a database plus a per-host Periphery agent, built for a fleet with Git-backed deployments. Pick Dockge for a tidy single-host UI you already run, and Komodo when you’ve outgrown one host and want real multi-server automation.

Which should you run?

  • One or two hosts, you like Compose, you want it to stay portable → Dockge if it is already running; Arcane for a new install. Both keep your compose files on disk; only Arcane still ships releases.
  • A fleet of hosts, you want GitOps, Swarm and uncapped management → Komodo. Free and uncapped; accept running a database and per-host agents.
  • You need Kubernetes or Podman, or BE team features, and fit the 3-node free tier (or can pay), or CE 2.45 already does the job → Portainer. Revisit before 2.45 LTS support ends in May 2027.

If you manage Docker across several Proxmox nodes, Komodo’s fleet model is the natural fit.

Moving off Portainer without breaking anything

Portainer never owned your containers. It only ever held its own view of the Docker engine, so migrating is additive. You install the new tool alongside Portainer and move stacks over one at a time.

The cleanest path, whichever tool you land on, is to get your compose files into Git first (or at least onto disk in a tidy folder tree). Web-editor stacks are not files you manage. The bigiron migration guide pulls each one’s compose text from Portainer’s API (/api/stacks/<id>/file). Once your stacks are plain compose.yaml files you control, both alternatives adopt them directly and Portainer’s lock-in stops mattering.

  • To Dockge is almost trivial: point Dockge at the directory holding your compose files and it picks them up as stacks.
  • To Komodo takes more setup (stand up Core, a database, and a Periphery agent per host), but then you add each stack pointing at its compose file, ideally from your Git repo, and redeploy. Komodo matches a running project by its compose project name, so set project_name when it differs from the stack name. Move one stack at a time. Confirm it is healthy before the next. Leave Portainer running until the last stack is across, then remove it.

The one gotcha: secrets you injected through Portainer’s UI don’t come along. Portainer stores stack environment overrides in its own database, so those values live nowhere in your compose files. Before you decommission Portainer, export or re-note every override and re-add it as a Komodo secret (referenced as [[KEY]]) or in the stack’s environment. Miss one and a stack redeploys with a blank password.

Other Portainer alternatives: Arcane, Dockhand, Coolify, and Yacht

  • Arcane — a Docker UI written in Go that runs as one container, BSD-3-Clause, with OIDC, passkeys, remote agents and Swarm stacks. It keeps Compose projects as files in its data directory and shipped v2.13.1 on September 22, 2026, its 19th release in 90 days. If you like Dockge but want a maintained release line and container-level management, start here.
  • Dockhand — a Docker manager under BSL 1.1 (free for personal and internal business use; it converts to Apache 2.0 on January 1, 2029) with Grype and Trivy vulnerability scans per image, OIDC SSO and a Hawser agent for remote hosts. RBAC is an Enterprise feature. v1.0.49 shipped September 23, 2026.
  • Coolify — worth calling out because it’s a different category. Coolify is a self-hosted PaaS (a Heroku/Vercel-style, Git-driven deploy platform with 280+ one-click services), not a container-management UI. If your goal is “push to Git and get a running app with SSL and a domain,” reach for Coolify; if it’s “see and control the containers I already run,” that’s Portainer/Dockge/Komodo territory. That category gap is the answer to Portainer vs Coolify.
  • Yacht — a lightweight, template-driven Docker UI. Its README opens with “This applicaton has not been updated in a while”, so it carries Dockge’s caveat and more: I would not start a new install on it. Portainer vs Yacht comes down to “simple templates” vs “full platform.”

The verdict

Komodo is the answer when you’ve outgrown one host and don’t want a license meter on your own infrastructure, and it now covers Swarm. Portainer remains the most capable platform: CE 2.45 LTS is a supported place to stay until May 2027, and the free three-node BE licence covers 3.x if you want it. Dockge is fine where it already runs. A new single-host install should start on Arcane, which keeps the same file model and still ships releases.

Resource use depends on the version, the stacks and the agents. The architecture diagram shows the services you need to run, but it does not establish a RAM or CPU ranking. If footprint decides the choice, compare docker stats under your own workload. The Docker RAM planner can help budget the host before installation.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Is Portainer still free in 2026?
Yes, in two ways. Community Edition (Zlib licence) is free and stays on the 2.x line: Portainer’s September 11, 2026 announcement says CE will not move to 3.x, and its lifecycle page supports 2.45 LTS until May 2027. Business Edition is free for up to three nodes, one licence per organization, and 3.x stays free on those terms. Past that, Home & Student is $155/year (up to 15 nodes, non-commercial), Starter is from $105/month and Scale from $209/month. CE supports custom OAuth and limited LDAP; RBAC, provider templates, group mapping and audit logging are BE features.
What is Komodo and why are people switching to it from Portainer?
Komodo is an open-source (GPL-3.0), Rust-built Docker and stack manager with a Core (central server plus database) and Periphery (an agent on each managed host) architecture. The draw is that it has no server cap and no API cap, which its README states, and one GPL-3.0 edition, so fleet management and automation are included. Since v2.0.0 (March 24, 2026) it also manages Docker Swarm. The trade is more moving parts: a Rust Core, a database (MongoDB, or FerretDB on Postgres) and a Periphery agent per server.
What is Dockge and who is it for?
Dockge is a lightweight, MIT-licensed Docker Compose manager by Louis Lam, the creator of Uptime Kuma. It is Compose-only and keeps your compose.yaml editable on disk (it ‘won’t kidnap your compose files’), with a web editor, a terminal, and multi-agent support since v1.4. It has no RBAC, no OIDC, no vulnerability scanning and no REST API. Its last tagged release is 1.5.0 from March 30, 2025. It suits one or two Compose hosts where you already run it; a new install that wants the same file model should look at Arcane.
Komodo vs Portainer vs Dockge — which should I use?
Use Komodo if you manage a fleet of hosts, want Git-backed deployments or Swarm, and do not want a licence meter; it is free and uncapped, at the cost of running a database and agents. Use Portainer if you need Kubernetes, Podman or its BE team features and fit the three-node free tier or can pay, or if CE 2.45 LTS already does the job; it is supported until May 2027. Use Dockge for one or two Compose hosts if you already run it and accept that it has not released since March 2025.
How do I move from Portainer to Komodo without downtime?
You don’t do a hard cutover; you run both side by side. Portainer never owned your containers, only its own view of them, so install Komodo (Core and database, then a Periphery agent on each host) alongside Portainer and add your stacks by pointing Komodo at your compose files, ideally from a Git repo. Komodo matches a running project by its compose project name, so set project_name when it differs from the stack name. Redeploy one stack, confirm it’s healthy, then move the next; leave Portainer running until everything is migrated. The one real gotcha: secrets you injected through Portainer’s UI live in Portainer’s own database, not in your compose files, so re-add each one as a Komodo secret (referenced as [[KEY]]) or in the stack’s environment. Dockge is simpler to move to: it adopts the compose.yaml already on disk.
Does Komodo or Dockge support multiple Docker hosts?
Both do. Komodo is built around multi-host from the ground up: its Periphery agent runs on each server and reports to the central Core, with no limit on how many servers you connect, and since v2.0.0 Periphery can open the connection to Core itself. Dockge added multi-agent support in v1.4, letting one Dockge instance manage Compose stacks across several hosts. Portainer also manages multiple environments, but in CE without RBAC, and its richer multi-environment governance (teams, role mapping) is a Business Edition feature.
Which Docker manager uses the least resources?
This page gives no RAM or CPU figure: footprint depends on version, host and how many stacks and agents you run, so measure it on your own host with docker stats. What differs by design is how many services each runs: Dockge is one container, Portainer one server container plus optional agents, and Komodo a Rust Core, a database and a Periphery agent per host.
Is Portainer or Dockge better?
They target different users. Dockge is better for one or two hosts where you live in Docker Compose and want a light UI that keeps compose.yaml editable on disk, provided you accept no release since March 2025. Portainer is better if you need breadth (Kubernetes, Swarm, Podman, edge) or Business Edition team features like granular RBAC and identity-provider group mapping, and you fit its free three-node tier. For a Compose-only homelab I would take Dockge’s file model over Portainer’s, and on a new install Arcane’s.
What are the best Portainer alternatives in 2026?
The ones I would look at first are Komodo (uncapped multi-host GitOps and Swarm, GPL-3.0), Arcane (a Go-based Docker UI, BSD-3-Clause, v2.13.1 on September 22, 2026) and Dockge (a lightweight Compose manager, MIT, no release since March 2025). Dockhand adds per-image vulnerability scans under a BSL 1.1 licence that is free for personal and internal business use; Yacht is a simpler template-based UI. Coolify is a different kind of tool: a self-hosted PaaS for deploying apps from Git rather than a container-management dashboard.
Is Arcane a good Portainer alternative?
Yes, for a Compose user who wants a maintained release line. It is open source (BSD-3-Clause), written in Go, runs as one container with its database in its data volume, keeps Compose projects as files on disk, and supports OIDC, passkeys, remote agents and Swarm stacks. It shipped 19 tagged releases in the 90 days to September 24, 2026, the most of any tool compared here.
What is the difference between Coolify and Portainer?
They solve different problems. Portainer is a container-management UI — it shows and controls the Docker/Kubernetes containers, images, volumes, and networks you already run. Coolify is a self-hosted Platform-as-a-Service: you connect a Git repo and it builds, deploys, and serves your app with automatic SSL and a domain, Heroku-style. Use Portainer (or Dockge/Komodo) to manage containers; use Coolify to deploy applications from source.

Sources and corrections

Last updated
Methodology
See our methodology for research and review standards.
Update log
  • 2026-09-24 — Portainer announced 3.0 on 2026-09-11 (Kubernetes-first; CE stays on 2.x, 2.45 LTS supported to May 2027). Re-read every version, price and capability against the GitHub releases API, Portainer’s blog, lifecycle and pricing pages, Komodo’s v2.0.0 notes and docs, Arcane’s v2.10.0 notes and docs, the Dockhand README and Dockge issue #1002. Portainer 2.39.6 became 2.45.1 and 2.39.8; BE prices $99/$199/$149 became $105/$209/$155; Komodo v2.3.2 became v2.3.3; Swarm is no longer Portainer-only (Komodo v2.0.0, 2026-03-24). Added the ‘If you run Portainer CE today’ table. Removed the unsourced community-sentiment ranking and the r/selfhosted thread titles that carried no URLs.
  • 2026-09-08 — Separated CE authentication from BE RBAC, provider templates and group mapping across the summary, table, FAQ and feature card. This is a documentation correction; prior version and price snapshots were not refreshed.
  • 2026-08-22 — Citation correction. The Komodo quotation carried a third clause, “No ‘business edition’ here,” inside quotation marks and attributed to their docs. Re-checked 2026-08-22: neither komo.do/docs/intro nor the project README contains that sentence. The first two clauses are real and are now quoted from the README in full rather than elided, and the point about there being no paid tier is restated as our own observation from the licence. The FAQ made the same over-attribution (‘its docs say so explicitly’) and is re-scoped to the two limits the README actually states.
  • 2026-08-22 — Currency re-check against the GitHub release and repository APIs (retrieved 2026-08-22). The at-a-glance table’s ‘Latest’ row still carried the July snapshot (Komodo v2.2, Dockge v1.5, Portainer 2.39 LTS) even though the 2026-08-14 entry had confirmed Komodo v2.3.2; the row now reads 22 Aug 2026: Portainer 2.39.6 LTS (12 Aug), Komodo v2.3.2 (11 Aug), Dockge v1.5.0 (30 Mar 2025), and the two prose/source parentheticals that still said v2.2 were aligned. The ‘What you actually run’ card said Dockge’s per-host agent arrived in v1.5+ while the rest of the page (and the 1.4.0 release notes) say v1.4; corrected to v1.4+. Star counts refreshed to the same retrieval date: Portainer 38.3k, Komodo 12.0k, Dockge 24.1k, Arcane 7.1k (diagram text and alt updated to match). Portainer BE pricing ($99/$199 per month, $149/yr Home and Student, 3 nodes free renewed yearly, one licence per web domain), the CE/BE feature split (7-role RBAC, SSO templates with group mapping, audit logging, S3 backup BE-only) and Komodo’s MongoDB/FerretDB and no-server-limit statements were re-confirmed against the vendor pages. No verdict changed.
  • 2026-08-14 — Release-cadence audit against each project’s GitHub releases and commit history. Disclosed that Dockge has shipped no tagged release since v1.5.0 (30 Mar 2025) despite feature commits through Apr 2026 - material because the page recommends it for single/dual-host use. Corrected Portainer’s STS line from 2.43 to 2.44 and pinned the LTS line to its current patch (2.39.6). Komodo confirmed current at v2.3.2. No verdict changed; the Dockge recommendation now carries the cadence caveat.
Corrections
Spotted an error or a stale number? Email contact@techfuelhq.com. Confirmed corrections are recorded here with the date and change.

About the author

Written by Lowell K. Wood IV, who builds and runs TechFuelHQ from St. Louis, Missouri.